How is war understood in the Realist theoretical tradition Outline

How is war understood in the Realist metaphysical tradition - Outline ExampleIt is established in this analysis that the Realist theoretical tradition has been the most pertinent theoretical perspective on the subject of war and conflict in the post- frigidity War order in the universe. Realism is atomic number 53 of the most important positivist theories which focal point on state security and might Introduction The end of arctic War brought about an inevitable focus on the concept of war and conflict in the matter of international relations and several significant theoretical perspectives emerged. It is essential to realize that the realist, liberal, and radical traditions harbor been the most significant theoretical perspectives dealing with war and conflict in the international relations theory. Significantly, the realist theoretical tradition of war maintains that there is an enduring impulse for conflict between states in the international relations, whereas the libera l theoretical tradition identifies various ways to alleviate the conflictive tendencies and the radical theoretical tradition emphasizes on the of transformation of the entire system of state relations. As Little and Smith (2006) maintain, the realist theoretical tradition was the most dominant theoretical perspective all through the Cold War. ... ures of the American-Soviet rivalry.1 It is pertinent to establish that state security and power above other states are the essential components of the realist theoretical tradition regarding war and conflict. Significantly, realism is non a single theory and it has several classifications which evolved considerably during the Cold War period. In an examination of how war is understood in the realist theoretical tradition, it becomes evident that the intelligent construct called realism focuses on international anarchy, insecurity, and the state, and it provides an effective way to deal with the contemporary world politics. As it remain s the overriding paradigm in the study of international relations, it is fundamental to analyze how the realist theoretical tradition explains war. Significantly, the realist theoretical tradition relies heavily on the structure of the international system or the distribution of power as the major element in explaining foreign policies and international outcomes. If realism provides a worthwhile explanatory framework, then propositions derived from it should yield insights about state strategies and deportment in light of this shift in the global distribution of power Realism remains a powerful and valuable explanatory framework, the end of the Cold War notwithstanding.2 Therefore, it is important to recognize that the role of the realist theoretical tradition remains unquestioned even in the contemporary international relations and world politics, and an analysis of the realist interpretation of the concept of war is most warranted. Scope of the Study In a world threatened by the realities of war in transgress of the existence of several theoretical frameworks for international relations, it is fundamental to be aware of the